ComparisonDecember 16, 20249 min read

GPT-4 vs Claude 3: Which AI is Better in 2024? Honest Comparison

Head-to-head comparison of OpenAI GPT-4 and Anthropic Claude 3. We test coding, writing, reasoning, and voice applications to find the best AI model.

LT

LangVoice Team

AI Research

GPT-4 vs Claude 3: Which AI is Better in 2024? Honest Comparison

GPT-4 vs Claude 3: Which AI is Better in 2024?

The AI model wars continue. OpenAI's GPT-4 and Anthropic's Claude 3 are the top contenders. Here's an honest, detailed comparison based on real-world testing.

Model Overview

GPT-4 Family (OpenAI)

  • GPT-4o (Omni): Fastest, multimodal
  • GPT-4 Turbo: Balanced speed/quality
  • GPT-4: Original, most tested

Claude 3 Family (Anthropic)

  • Claude 3 Opus: Smartest, most expensive
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Best value (recommended)
  • Claude 3 Haiku: Fast, affordable

Benchmark Comparison

TaskGPT-4oClaude 3.5 SonnetWinner
Coding88%92%Claude
Math90%91%Tie
Writing85%89%Claude
Reasoning87%90%Claude
SpeedFasterFastGPT-4o
Vision⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐GPT-4o

Coding Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Advantages:

  • Larger context window (200K vs 128K)
  • More accurate code generation
  • Better at following specific instructions
  • Honest about what it doesn't know

GPT-4o Advantages:

  • Faster response times
  • Better multimodal (images + code)
  • Larger training data
  • ChatGPT ecosystem

Writing Quality

Claude tends to produce:

  • More natural, human-like prose
  • Better structured long-form content
  • Fewer cliché phrases

GPT-4 tends to produce:

  • More creative variations
  • Better at specific styles
  • Strong SEO optimization

For Voice AI Applications

When building voice-enabled applications, both work great with LangVoice:

# Works with either model
from langvoice_sdk import LangVoiceClient

langvoice = LangVoiceClient(api_key="your-key")

# Generate speech from any AI's output
audio = langvoice.generate(
    text=ai_response,
    voice="heart",
    language="american_english"
)

Safety and Alignment

  • Claude: Built with Constitutional AI, tends to be more cautious
  • GPT-4: RLHF training, occasionally looser guardrails

Pricing Comparison

ModelInput (1M tokens)Output (1M tokens)
GPT-4o$5$15
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3$15
Claude 3 Opus$15$75

Our Verdict

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet when:

  • Coding is primary use case
  • Need large context windows
  • Want most accurate responses
  • Building AI agents

Choose GPT-4o when:

  • Need multimodal capabilities
  • Want fastest responses
  • Using ChatGPT ecosystem
  • Require real-time conversation

For Voice Applications: Both work excellently with LangVoice. Our SDK supports seamless integration with OpenAI and Anthropic.

Conclusion

There's no definitive winner—it depends on your use case. For coding and AI agents, Claude 3.5 Sonnet edges ahead. For multimodal and speed, GPT-4o wins.

The good news: LangVoice works with both, so you can easily switch or combine them.

Tags

GPT-4Claude 3AI comparisonOpenAIAnthropicChatGPTAI models

Ready to Transform Your Text to Speech?

Try LangVoice free and experience the most natural AI voices for your content.

Try LangVoice Free

Related Articles